Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

New Hampshire Case Commentaries

Material Prejudice and Proof of Coverage Gaps in Wireless Tower Zoning: Commentary on Whittier Communications, Inc. v. Town of Wakefield

Material Prejudice and Proof of Coverage Gaps in Wireless Tower Zoning: Commentary on Whittier Communications, Inc. v. Town of Wakefield

Date: Dec 16, 2025
Material Prejudice and Proof of Coverage Gaps in Wireless Tower Zoning: Commentary on Whittier Communications, Inc. v. Town of Wakefield I. Introduction This commentary analyzes the Supreme Court of...
Scrivener’s Errors, Pension Division, and Interim Orders in Divorce: Commentary on In the Matter of Warren & Jean Jackson (N.H. 2025)

Scrivener’s Errors, Pension Division, and Interim Orders in Divorce: Commentary on In the Matter of Warren & Jean Jackson (N.H. 2025)

Date: Nov 22, 2025
Scrivener’s Errors, Pension Division, and Interim Orders in Divorce: Commentary on In the Matter of Warren & Jean Jackson (N.H. 2025) I. Introduction The New Hampshire Supreme Court’s order in In the...
Reasonable Need, Not the Formula, Controls Term Alimony Under RSA 458:19-a: Commentary on In the Matter of Laurie Bondaz & Jean‑Pierre Bondaz

Reasonable Need, Not the Formula, Controls Term Alimony Under RSA 458:19-a: Commentary on In the Matter of Laurie Bondaz & Jean‑Pierre Bondaz

Date: Nov 22, 2025
Reasonable Need, Not the Statutory Formula, Controls Term Alimony Under RSA 458:19-a: Commentary on In the Matter of Laurie Bondaz & Jean‑Pierre Bondaz Commentary on the New Hampshire Supreme Court’s...
State v. Laforest: Defining the “Appropriate Court” Under New Hampshire’s Interstate Agreement on Detainers

State v. Laforest: Defining the “Appropriate Court” Under New Hampshire’s Interstate Agreement on Detainers

Date: Nov 22, 2025
State v. Laforest: Defining the “Appropriate Court” Under New Hampshire’s Interstate Agreement on Detainers I. Introduction In State v. Laforest, 2025 N.H. 49 (Nov. 21, 2025), the New Hampshire...
“Personnel Information” and Foreseeable Admissibility: Doe v. Concord Police Department and the Scope of New Hampshire’s Exculpatory Evidence Schedule

“Personnel Information” and Foreseeable Admissibility: Doe v. Concord Police Department and the Scope of New Hampshire’s Exculpatory Evidence Schedule

Date: Nov 20, 2025
“Personnel Information” and Foreseeable Admissibility: Doe v. Concord Police Department and the Scope of New Hampshire’s Exculpatory Evidence Schedule I. Introduction The Supreme Court of New...
UAGPPJA Is the Exclusive Basis for Adult Guardianship Jurisdiction in New Hampshire; “Home State” Is Determined by Physical Presence and a Respondent’s Objection Defeats Significant‑Connection Jurisdiction

UAGPPJA Is the Exclusive Basis for Adult Guardianship Jurisdiction in New Hampshire; “Home State” Is Determined by Physical Presence and a Respondent’s Objection Defeats Significant‑Connection Jurisdiction

Date: Nov 9, 2025
UAGPPJA Is the Exclusive Basis for Adult Guardianship Jurisdiction in New Hampshire; “Home State” Is Determined by Physical Presence and a Respondent’s Objection Defeats Significant‑Connection...
Stipulated Relocation Timelines Do Not Terminate UCCJEA Exclusive, Continuing Jurisdiction Absent RSA 458-A:13 Findings

Stipulated Relocation Timelines Do Not Terminate UCCJEA Exclusive, Continuing Jurisdiction Absent RSA 458-A:13 Findings

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Stipulated Relocation Timelines Do Not Terminate UCCJEA Exclusive, Continuing Jurisdiction Absent RSA 458-A:13 Findings Introduction In the Matter of Taylor Coyne and Ashley Blanchfield (N.H. Sup....
Statutory Right of Way and Directed Verdicts in Negligence: Commentary on Sheila Jenot v. Lyman Jenot, Jr. & a.

Statutory Right of Way and Directed Verdicts in Negligence: Commentary on Sheila Jenot v. Lyman Jenot, Jr. & a.

Date: Oct 29, 2025
Statutory Right of Way Does Not Justify a Directed Verdict in Negligence: Commentary on Sheila Jenot v. Lyman Jenot, Jr. & a. (N.H. 2025) 1. Introduction This New Hampshire Supreme Court order in...
Sending Districts Must Pay Tuition to Out‑of‑District Open Enrollment Schools Even Without Local Program Adoption (RSA 194‑D)

Sending Districts Must Pay Tuition to Out‑of‑District Open Enrollment Schools Even Without Local Program Adoption (RSA 194‑D)

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Sending Districts Must Pay Tuition to Out‑of‑District Open Enrollment Schools Even Without Local Program Adoption (RSA 194‑D) Introduction In Appeal of Pittsfield School District, 2025 N.H. 46 (Oct....
Ball v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Manchester: RSA 508:4-g Cannot Revive Pre-2020 Time-Barred Sexual-Assault Claims; Police-Power Balancing Limited to Contract-Impairment; Vested Limitations Defense Reaffirmed

Ball v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Manchester: RSA 508:4-g Cannot Revive Pre-2020 Time-Barred Sexual-Assault Claims; Police-Power Balancing Limited to Contract-Impairment; Vested Limitations Defense Reaffirmed

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Ball v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Manchester: RSA 508:4-g Cannot Revive Pre-2020 Time-Barred Sexual-Assault Claims; Police-Power Balancing Limited to Contract-Impairment; Vested Limitations Defense...
No Unequal Bargaining Power Required: N.H. Supreme Court Affirms Constructive Trust and Applies Discovery Rule to Latent Ownership Claims in Family Business

No Unequal Bargaining Power Required: N.H. Supreme Court Affirms Constructive Trust and Applies Discovery Rule to Latent Ownership Claims in Family Business

Date: Oct 8, 2025
No Unequal Bargaining Power Required: N.H. Supreme Court Affirms Constructive Trust and Applies Discovery Rule to Latent Ownership Claims in Family Business Introduction In Michael L. McLaughlin v....
Judkins Clarifies: Testimony About the Absence of a DMV Decertification Request Is Not Hearsay, and Lesser-Included OAS Instructions Require an Independent Evidentiary Basis

Judkins Clarifies: Testimony About the Absence of a DMV Decertification Request Is Not Hearsay, and Lesser-Included OAS Instructions Require an Independent Evidentiary Basis

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Judkins Clarifies: Testimony About the Absence of a DMV Decertification Request Is Not Hearsay, and Lesser-Included OAS Instructions Require an Independent Evidentiary Basis Introduction In State of...
Charging Official Cannot Preside: NH Supreme Court Requires Recusal of Fish & Game Executive Director and Confirms Certiorari Review for Volunteer Instructor Revocations

Charging Official Cannot Preside: NH Supreme Court Requires Recusal of Fish & Game Executive Director and Confirms Certiorari Review for Volunteer Instructor Revocations

Date: Sep 20, 2025
Charging Official Cannot Preside: Recusal Required for Agency Head Who Signed Revocation; Certiorari Is the Proper Review Path Introduction In Petition of Dean, 2025 N.H 44, the New Hampshire Supreme...
Independent Source Doctrine Purges Taint of Unlawful Cell-Phone Seizure: Commentary on State v. Rodriguez, 2025 N.H. 43

Independent Source Doctrine Purges Taint of Unlawful Cell-Phone Seizure: Commentary on State v. Rodriguez, 2025 N.H. 43

Date: Sep 20, 2025
Independent Source Doctrine Purges Taint of Unlawful Cell-Phone Seizure: State v. Rodriguez, 2025 N.H. 43 Introduction In State v. Rodriguez, 2025 N.H. 43, the Supreme Court of New Hampshire affirmed...
No Written Findings Needed When Denying Child-Support Deviation; Extracurricular Costs Are Included in Guideline Support — In the Matter of Carr & Carr (N.H. 2025)

No Written Findings Needed When Denying Child-Support Deviation; Extracurricular Costs Are Included in Guideline Support — In the Matter of Carr & Carr (N.H. 2025)

Date: Sep 18, 2025
No Written Findings Needed When Denying Child-Support Deviation; Extracurricular Costs Are Included in Guideline Support Commentary on In the Matter of Clara Carr and Ryan Carr, Supreme Court of New...
New Hampshire Narrows Crime-Fraud Exception to Intended Fraud and Confirms Common-Interest Privilege Requires Pending Litigation

New Hampshire Narrows Crime-Fraud Exception to Intended Fraud and Confirms Common-Interest Privilege Requires Pending Litigation

Date: Sep 17, 2025
New Hampshire Narrows Crime-Fraud Exception to Intended Fraud and Confirms Common-Interest Privilege Requires Pending Litigation Introduction In Atl. Anesthesia, P.A. v. Lehrer, 2025 N.H. 42, the...
Time-of-Service Knowledge, Not Post-Event Intoxication, Governs Overservice Liability Under RSA 179:5, I

Time-of-Service Knowledge, Not Post-Event Intoxication, Governs Overservice Liability Under RSA 179:5, I

Date: Sep 13, 2025
Time-of-Service Knowledge, Not Post-Event Intoxication, Governs Overservice Liability Under RSA 179:5, I Introduction In Appeal of Tower Hill Tavern, LLC, 2025 N.H. 41, the New Hampshire Supreme...
Purposely Failing to Stop Is Independently Chargeable Under RSA 265:4, I(c): No Proof of Willful Eluding Required

Purposely Failing to Stop Is Independently Chargeable Under RSA 265:4, I(c): No Proof of Willful Eluding Required

Date: Sep 13, 2025
Purposely Failing to Stop Is Independently Chargeable Under RSA 265:4, I(c): No Proof of Willful Eluding Required Introduction In State of New Hampshire v. Donald Thompson (No. 2024-0519), decided by...
Police Non-Charging Is Not Dispositive; Pattern Evidence Permissible to Prove a “Credible Present Threat” Under RSA 173-B — Commentary on S.L. v. S.B. (N.H. Sept. 12, 2025)

Police Non-Charging Is Not Dispositive; Pattern Evidence Permissible to Prove a “Credible Present Threat” Under RSA 173-B — Commentary on S.L. v. S.B. (N.H. Sept. 12, 2025)

Date: Sep 13, 2025
Police Non-Charging Is Not Dispositive; Pattern Evidence Permissible to Prove a “Credible Present Threat” Under RSA 173-B — Commentary on S.L. v. S.B. (N.H. Sept. 12, 2025) Introduction In S.L. v....
Separate and Distinct: N.H. Supreme Court Clarifies that Dependents’ Workers’ Comp Death-Benefit Claims Are Independent Under RSA 281-A:26; RSA 281-A:42-d Clock Runs from Denial of the Dependent’s Claim and the Injury Date Is the Date of Death

Separate and Distinct: N.H. Supreme Court Clarifies that Dependents’ Workers’ Comp Death-Benefit Claims Are Independent Under RSA 281-A:26; RSA 281-A:42-d Clock Runs from Denial of the Dependent’s Claim and the Injury Date Is the Date of Death

Date: Sep 13, 2025
Separate and Distinct: N.H. Supreme Court Clarifies that Dependents’ Workers’ Comp Death-Benefit Claims Are Independent Under RSA 281-A:26; RSA 281-A:42-d Clock Runs from Denial of the Dependent’s...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert